The Incompatibility Conundrum

Employees who cause disharmony in the workplace are often found to be ‘incompatible’ with the working environment or corporate culture of the employer. Incompatibility often stems from certain personality traits, personal differences, unacceptable conduct or behavioural problems, causing unwarranted tension and conflict between employees.

The Constitutional Court restricts the use of derivative misconduct

he concept of derivative misconduct has received a great deal of judicial attention over the last few years. In many instances, charging employees for derivative misconduct is the last resort for employers who are the victims of collective misconduct and who are unable to identify the perpetrators of that violence. In such cases, employees who can identify those who committed the misconduct but fail to do so are dismissed for the breach of their duty of good faith to their employer. This has become known as ‘derivative misconduct’.

Resolution of Class Action Equal Pay Disputes

The insertion of the equal pay provisions into the Employment Equity Act in 2014 and the subsequent amendment of the Labour Relations Act in 2015 in respect of equal pay for labour broker employees, part-time employees and fixed-term employees have resulted in a litany of disputes being referred to the CCMA in respect of these issues.