The pursuit of the hopeless case – the Labour Court gets tough

In recent months the Labour Court has signalled on more than one occasion that its processes are not to be abused by litigants. The Court’s articulation of this principle comes in response to an increasing number of meritless disputes which are being pursued or defended at the Labour Court. Such ‘hopeless’ cases create unnecessary delays in the adjudication of disputes, negatively impact on the Court, its judges and other litigants and prevent genuine disputes from being resolved timeously in accordance with the principle of expeditious dispute resolution espoused by the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, as amended (“the LRA”). We set out some of the pertinent issues in this recent development as they are particularly relevant to attorneys.

Union Representation in Labour Disputes – is the Position Now Settled?

We have previously written a series of articles dealing with the rights of a Union to represent employees in labour disputes as the Constitutional Court and Labour Appeal Court clarified the issues. In essence, the legal position until a few days ago permitted an employer to interrogate whether an employee is actually a member of a union in disputes related to collective bargaining issues, such as organisational rights, but not in circumstances where other disputes were being pursued, such as in an unfair dismissal case.

Stop the Strike, Stop the Lock-out

South African employers and the general public are no strangers to strikes. The LRA makes it very easy to embark on a strike – once a dispute is declared by employees and it cannot be resolved, either through conciliation or within 30 days, the strike may commence after issuing a strike notice.

The (Almost) Inescapable Nature of Collective Agreements

The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“the LRA”) is largely premised on a power-play approach to collective bargaining. Industrial action manifests itself in two forms, employees can embark on strike action and employers can implement a lock-out. However, sections 65(1) and 65(3) contain crucial limitations on industrial action which, if contravened, will render that industrial action unlawful and unprotected.